Case Study

From Scattered Records to a Structured Risk Workflow: How an Australian Healthcare Provider Built a Psychosocial Risk Management Workflow With Zoho Creator

One Register
For reported hazards
Named Owner
For every control
Automated
Reminders and reviews
At a Glance
IndustryHealthcare
LocationAustralia
ChallengePsychosocial hazard reports, risk assessments, and follow-up actions spread across emails, spreadsheets, paper forms, and meeting notes, with no consistent way to track ownership or reviews.
SolutionA custom psychosocial risk management application built on Zoho Creator by Xponential, covering hazard reporting, risk assessment, control tracking, and scheduled reviews.
Key results One register for reported hazards A named owner for every control Automated reminders and reviews Role-based access for confidential reports Live management visibility across sites

Client Profile

The healthcare provider operates residential and community care services across several locations in Australia, with teams covering clinical, allied health, support, and administrative roles. Many employees work shifts, and their workload varies from day to day. Staff regularly dealt with high workloads, time pressure, emotionally demanding interactions, and at times aggression from patients or visitors. The organization needed a clear way to identify these workplace risks and determine where support or action was needed.

Expectations around managing psychosocial risk have become more explicit under Australian work health and safety regulations and codes of practice. The provider wanted a more structured way to show how hazards were being identified, assessed, controlled, and reviewed, and to give staff a simple way to raise concerns knowing they would be acted on.

Existing Approach to Psychosocial Hazard Reporting

Physical hazards and incidents were already captured through the provider's incident reporting process. Psychosocial hazards were handled in a more informal way. Staff raised concerns about workload, fatigue, occupational violence, bullying, or conflict through their line manager, by email to the WHS team, on paper forms, or in team meetings.

Risk assessments were recorded in a spreadsheet maintained by the WHS coordinator. Agreed control measures were captured in meeting notes, and follow-up relied on each manager's capacity.

This approach worked while the number of reports was small, but as the organization grew across sites, the WHS team needed a way to see every report, assessment, and action in one place.

Challenges With Hazard Reporting and Risk Assessment

Multiple reporting channels

Hazard reports came through email, paper forms, conversations, and meetings. This meant some reports did not reach the WHS team, while others were recorded more than once.

Different assessment methods

Risk assessments were handled differently across sites. Managers used different approaches to rate likelihood, consequence, frequency, and duration, which made it harder to assess risks in the same way across the organization.

Controls without clear ownership

Control measures were agreed in meetings, but there was no set place to record who owned each one or when it was due.

Reviews not scheduled

Without set review dates, it was hard to show whether a control was actually reducing the risk it was put in place for.

Sensitive reports in shared spaces

Bullying and harassment concerns sat in shared inboxes and spreadsheets, with limited control over who could view them.

Manual management reporting

Reports for management and the WHS committee were compiled by hand from several sources, which made trends across sites difficult to spot.

Requirements for a Centralized Workflow

The provider wanted staff to have one place to report a concern, whether they were working at a desk or on a shift. Reports needed to follow the same process for identifying the hazard, assessing the risk, putting controls in place, and reviewing the outcome. The process also needed to reflect the approach set out in Safe Work Australia's model Code of Practice for managing psychosocial hazards at work.

The provider also needed clear ownership for every control, including a due date and a way to follow up when an action was overdue. Access needed to be based on user roles so confidential reports were only available to the appropriate people. The organization wanted to keep a record of each report and be able to view information by site, hazard type, and risk level. It also needed a system that could be updated as its requirements changed, which made Zoho Creator a suitable platform for the application.

Zoho Creator Application and Workflow Design

Xponential built a custom Zoho Creator application to bring the provider's psychosocial risk information and reporting process into one place. The application covers the process from the initial hazard report through risk assessment, control actions, and review. It uses four linked modules: Hazard Reports, Risk Assessments, Control Actions, and Reviews. Site and team details, hazard categories, user roles, and notification rules are also included, allowing each hazard to be followed through its assessment, assigned controls, and review outcome.

The Zoho Creator application also uses role-based permissions to control access to information. Staff can submit and view their own reports, managers can view reports for their site, and the WHS team can access the full register. Sensitive reports are restricted to designated officers. The application is available through the Zoho Creator mobile app, so staff can report a concern while working away from a desk. This brought hazard reports, risk assessments, controls, and reviews together in one structured system instead of having them spread across emails, spreadsheets, paper records, and meeting notes.

1

Hazard Reporting, Risk Assessment, and Control Tracking

The new Zoho Creator application gives staff one place to report a psychosocial hazard. The form records basic details such as the site, team, type of hazard, what happened, how frequently it occurs, and how long staff are exposed to it. A report can also be marked as confidential. The WHS coordinator reviews the submission and completes the risk assessment using the organization's existing risk matrix. Control measures are added to the same record, along with the person responsible, due date, type of control, and current status.

2

Notifications, Ownership, and Review Workflows

The Zoho Creator Blueprint takes the report through the next steps instead of leaving follow-up to separate emails or meeting notes. A report moves from assessment to control assignment, progress, review, and closure. The person responsible receives a notification when an action is assigned, followed by reminders as the due date approaches or passes. The application also sets review dates based on the risk level and keeps the review outcome with the original report.

3

Reporting and Management Visibility

Zoho Creator dashboards give the WHS team and management a view of open hazards, risk levels, overdue actions, and upcoming reviews across sites. Leadership and the WHS committee can use the same live data to track trends and prepare reports without collecting information from separate spreadsheets and records.

Business Impact

The WHS team now manages hazard reports, risk assessments, control actions, and reviews in one system, with each hazard's full record kept together.

Every report raised by staff is captured in the register, whichever site or shift it comes from. Each control has an owner and due date, and automated reminders let the WHS team see which actions are overdue without following up manually. Management and WHS committee reports now come from live dashboards rather than being compiled by hand, which frees the team to spend its time on the trends in the data.

The application can be updated as the provider adds sites, hazard categories, or review requirements, so the process can change without building a new system.

Before and After Results

AreaBeforeAfter
Hazard intakeEmail, verbal reports, paper forms, and meetingsOne reporting form on web and mobile
Risk assessmentVaried by site and manager, held in spreadsheetsStandard risk matrix with ratings calculated automatically
Control ownershipAgreed in meetings, often without an owner or due dateEvery control has a named owner, due date, and status
Follow upsManual reminders from individual managersAutomated reminders and escalation of overdue actions
ReviewsAd hoc and rarely documentedScheduled by risk rating, with outcomes recorded
ConfidentialityShared inboxes and spreadsheetsRole-based access and restricted categories
Management reportingCompiled manually across sitesLive dashboards by site, category, and risk level

Could This Workflow Work for Your Organization?

Managing psychosocial risk involves more than recording a hazard. Reports, assessments, control actions, and reviews all need to be kept together so the team can see what has been reported and what has been done. In this case, Zoho Creator brought these steps into one application, giving the WHS team a single place to manage reports and follow up on actions.
Xponential Digital designed and built the application around the provider's existing requirements, including hazard reporting, risk assessment, control tracking, notifications, reviews, and reporting.
If you're looking to bring psychosocial risk reporting into a single workflow, Xponential Digital can review your current process and show how Zoho Creator could support it.
Talk to Our Experts
WhatsApp Icon
✖
Xponential Digital Logo Xponential Digital
WhatsApp Icon Start Chat